Red and Blue God, Black and Blue Church Print E-mail
By Faithful Democrats
Oct. 24, 06 09:06

By Becky Garrison 

 

In my role as Senior Contributing Editor for The Wittenburg Door for over twelve years, I have become accustomed to the slings and arrows, as well as the occasional threatened lawsuit hurled by the Religious Right and the Progressive Left, whenever our satire magazine implies that they are behaving less than charitably, unchristian if you will. 

 

becky_garrison_red_and_blue_god_sm Whenever I report on their misdeeds, I “try” to remain faithful to The Door’s goal to “satirize something I love – the Church, and more generally people of faith – with the hope that my prodding might generate some course corrections while inducing a laugh or two... or three. Around the 2004 election, I got sick and tired of seeing Christians throwing each other to the lions. As I pondered this dichotomy between Jesus’ teachings and this Christian cat fighting, I started writing Red and Blue God, Black and Blue Church: Eyewitness Accounts of How American Churches are Hijacking Jesus, Bagging the Beatitudes and Worshipping the Almighty Dollar  (Jossey-Bass, 2006).


Throughout this book, I offer a series of satirical reflections on hot button issues such as the environment, prayer in the schools, and abortion that illuminate both the plank in the Religious Right’s eye as well as the speck that blinds the extreme Progressive Left. All too often Christians confuse acceptance of others with approval of their position, refusing at times to extend love towards those whose political views do not meet with their tacit approval. What happened to this love thy neighbor biz?

 

While Red and Blue God, Black and Blue Church highlights the battles between the warring political factions, I also note those all too rare instances when instead of creating ideological havens for like-minded political souls to gather, the church has chosen to receive the other based on the Greatest Commandment of all.
(In The Lost Message of Jesus) Steve Chalke and Alan Mann ask these challenging questions: “To what extent does the Church model the spiritually and socially inclusive message of Jesus? Are we liberators of excluded people or simply another dimension of their oppression? We may not exclude tax-collectors or hemorrhaging women, but what about schizophrenics, divorcees, single people, one-parent families, drug users, transsexuals or those struggling with their faith?” To this list I would add Christians we see as our political adversaries.
When we put partisan politics above seeking the kingdom of God, we get what we deserve. Mike Yaconelli reflected, “The impotence of today’s Church, the weakness of Christ’s followers, and the irrelevance of most parachurch organizations is directly related to the lack of being in the presence of an awesome, holy God, who continually demands allegiance only to Him—not to our organizations, to our churches or our theology.”

The Sojourners’ slogan has it right: God is not a Democrat or a Republican but rather Lord of all. And as Christians, it is our duty to let His light shine through instead of trying to advance our own personal and at times petty sociopolitical agendas. As Christians, we are called to be the salt of the world, but when we fail to follow Him, we’re just dishing out Christ’s teachings sans any seasoning (see Matthew 5:13). As Chalke and Mann note, “We get the Christianity we deserve—we just can’t pass the buck. The Church in the West—with some notable exceptions—has a tame faith because it has been giving a tame message for centuries. You can’t breed a radical, revolutionary movement on passive, middle-of-the-road rhetoric.”

Stanley Hauerwas notes that “Christians’ first political responsibility is to be the church, and by being the church, they should understand that their first loyalty is to God, the God we worship as Christians, in a manner that understands that we are not first and foremost about making democracy work, but about the truthful worship of the true God.” The challenge I present to U.S. churches is to seek to create the type of worshiping communities where red and blue Christians can come together not as political rivals seeking to do battle but in communion, joined together through baptism as brothers and sisters in Christ.

 


Will this happen? I dunno. As we approach the 2006 election, these political battles keep getting funnier and funnier. Let’s see, we have Hillary Clinton calling Jesus and the Good Samaritan illegal aliens even though they hail from Nazareth and Samaria respectively. Looks like the progressive clergy were so busy trying to secure a spot at her right hand that they failed to take her to task and suggest that her biblical interpretations might but, I dunno, wrong. Then you have Republican Congressman Mark Foley lending a unique twist to Jesus’ saying “let the children come to me (Luke 18:16). Given the Religious Right’s obsession over what unmarried people do with their genitals, coupled with their skewering of Clinton’s Oval Office escapades, I have to wonder what’s behind their silence here. 

becky-headshot-low_res Yeah, I’m seeing a lot of activity on the religious front right about now but not much in terms of actual transformation taking place. You know something’s just plain wrong when churches sponsor seminars, protests, conferences, and other actions in an attempt to defeat temporal “enemies” named Clinton or Bush.

This foolish quest to conform Christ’s teachings to the whims of a particular political party has really started hitting the faith and it’s been stinking up the local churches big time. I know Jesus was born in a barn but do churches have to smell like one as well? I dunno about you, but I think it’s high time we started mucking out the stables.

Becky Garrison is Senior Contributing Editor for The Wittenburg Door, the nation’s oldest, largest and only religious satire magazine and author of Black and Blue Church: Eyewitness Accounts of How American Churches are Hijacking Jesus, Bagging the Beatitudes, and Worshipping the Almighty Dollar (Jossey-Bass, 2006). She lives in New York City.


LIST OF COMMENTS

1/6. Right on!
Written by Tom Man  | Oct. 30, 06 12:33

Hey - thanks for writing this sorely needed book and the commentary. As a christian first, and semi-conservative democrat second, I've been disgusted by how many christian groups have drifted far away from Christ's message of peace and love.

The politicization of the church is disgraceful and undermines the whole message of Jesus to love one another and has encouraged many churches to focus all their energy on a tiny handful of divisive issues while almost abandoning the core teachings and themes of what it means to be Christian. So, I really appreciate the fresh perspective Becky has brought to the table in trying to get Christians to actually act like Christians and not hate mongers.

However, while I wholeheartedly agree with her message, I disagree that democrats share nearly as much blame as republicans. Republican's are far more guilty of politicizing religion and making it an integral part of the party platform - almost to the extent that you're not a good Christian unless you vote Republican. That sentiment simply doesn't exist across most of the Democratic Party where religion generally seems tangential to their platform. Christian values seem more central to the Democratic platform, but the focus isn't on religion per se. That's a pretty substantial value and a far more appropriate separation of church and state.


2/6. Excellent points!
Written by Becky Garrison  | Oct. 30, 06 23:52

Thanks for the feedback - what I am referencing is the quest on the part of some progressive religious leaders to form a spiritual left - the progressive's answer to the Religious Right. There's a fine line here between maintaining a prophetic voice and preaching partisan politics. And I see a need for prayerful discernment as we all try to walk this line so that the separation of church and state remains intact.  Definitely keep up the dialogue.


3/6. Partisanship
Written by Trapper Joe  | Oct. 31, 06 23:04
Becky, I understand that you want Christ to become monopolized to a single political party, Democrat or Republican.  But I really feel like it's unfair to Democrats to create this false equivalence just so you can appear to be above the partisan fray.  You said you're referring to a segment in the political left that does want to use religion equally cynically.  Where is this segment?  Can you name an organization or leader that fits?  I certainly don't know of any.

While it might be politically correct to condemn both parties, it ignores a fundamental reality of this era's politics: Republicans have said and done anything to manipulate voters and obtain power.  To them, elections are about winning; to us, they're about making a difference.  Sure, there's cynicism on the Dem side.  But nothing remotely close enough to warrant the "one side does this while the other side does that" routine.

4/6. Correction
Written by Trapper Joe  | Nov. 01, 06 09:53
I meant, I understand that you do NOT want Christ to be monopolized by a single party...

5/6. Check out God's Politics blog
Written by becky Garrison  | Nov. 02, 06 23:13

The spiritual left appears to be in the formative stage, so it's hard to say who will be the key players in the long run here. While I am impressed with what I've seen from say Sojourners, some of the press releases I have been receiving from religious organizations post the 2004 election have a definite stamp of the DNC on them.

I am raising a cautionary note that for those who are disgusted (and rightly so) by the Religious Right's hijacking of Jesus that embracing the DNC strikes me as picking the lesser of two evils. Look at our last election - you had two Ivy League educated men both of whom at least initially supported the Iraq War - Jon Stewart hit it on the head when he compared Kerry to Gore but without all the charisma.

 As Diana Butler Bass notes very eloquently that Jesus is not red or blue but purple.


6/6. Yes and no
Written by miggsathon  | Nov. 03, 06 11:53

Becky, I know what you're saying, and find myself between the two positions here.  Yes, there's a small danger that at some point way down the road the "Christian vote" (whatever that means) will be in danger of being considered the domain of the Democrats rather than the Republicans.  My issue is that we're in a target-rich environment.  There are endless injustices and problems to assail.  The question is, which do we pick?  And if you think it's worth putting the religious left on a relatively equal plane as the right in order to nip the possibility of abuse in the bud, I can understand that.


In terms of press releases that have the whiff of the DNC, Sojourners would qualify if they didn't keep asserting that God is not a Democrat.  They make no points that Democrats don't make, save that one.  (Though Democrats, including this site, don't make the opposite point either: that one cannot be a good Christian and vote Republican.)  I actually wish Sojourners would be more of a prophetic voice and use their independence to promote bolder proposals than those advocated by mainstream-to-liberal Democrats, like raising the minimum wage, increasing foreign aid to fight poverty, etc.


About picking the Dems as the lesser of two evils, that's absolutely right.  I pick the Dems for Nieburhian reasons: we have to play the hand we're dealt and try to change the world while accepting the reality of where we are.  But I certainly hope that social movements outside of electoral politics would push both major parties in the direction of social justice.


I do not agree that God is "purple," because that implies moderation between two shifting poles.  I think God transcends the partisan color scheme altogether.  Yet at the same time, we Christians -- though we see as through a glass darkly -- must seek to have God inform our politics if we are to be who we are and embrace a "totalizing" faith.

Last Updated ( Oct. 27, 06 10:57 )
 
< Prev   Next >