Death of an Adversary Print E-mail
By Jesse Lava
May. 15, 07 18:23

Jerry Falwell, dead today at 73, was a rock star of the Christian right.  He created Moral Majority.  He founded Liberty University.  He sued Larry Flynt.  He outed a Teletubby. 

 

And no matter what one thinks of his politics, Jerry Falwell was an effective proponent of a right-wing political agenda.  In Pat Robertson’s words, Falwell was a “tower of strength on many of the moral issues which have confronted our nation.”

 

We at FaithfulDemocrats.com disagreed vehemently with Falwell on which moral issues to focus on.  His priorities were not our priorities.  If he was a tower of strength, we believe he was a deeply misguided one.  But we respect his passion.  Revelation 3:16 tells us it’s better to be hot or cold than to be lukewarm, and Falwell certainly wasn’t the latter.  We offer our condolences to his family, friends, and colleagues.

 

And yet we would be remiss to let this moment pass without reflecting on one of the most regrettable features of the Falwell legacy — or at least, of the political movement that Falwell and his co-thinkers have left us: the notion that there’s a heavenly link between Christianity and the Republican Party.

 

Ever since Moral Majority helped mobilize millions of evangelical votes for Ronald Reagan in 1980, the meme that God is spelled G-O-P has crept into our national consciousness.  Today, a narrow agenda, focused on sexuality but sometimes spilling inexplicably into laissez-faire economics and a hawkish foreign policy, has come to define both the image of conservative Christians and the moral (or at least rhetorical) priorities of the Republican Party.

 

The Democrats’ preferred issues of poverty, creation care, racial righteousness, and international cooperation — though biblical — have received short shrift in our country’s debate on faith and values.  Many groups are working hard to change that.  Let’s keep that work going.

 

But in the process, let’s not make the same mistakes that Falwell did.  We would be wise to emulate his passion and effectiveness; we would be downright sacrilegious to conflate our church with our party — a habit which, ultimately, renders Christ our pawn instead of our king.


LIST OF COMMENTS

1/7. Falwell's Issues
Written by George  | May. 16, 07 08:48
It's interesting that Falwell chose not to involve himself or his church in the civil rights struggle of the 60's and 70's. Indeed, one can actually trace the migration of the once solidly Democratic South to what is now safely Red States beginning in 1948 when after Hubert Humphrey forced a Civil Rights Plank in the Democratic Platform, Strom Thurmond formed his own party and ran for president. The Republican Party inherited all of the racists who had previously been Democrats and they owe much of their electoral success to Falwell and that migration. When Nixon campaigned in the South in 1968, he frequently referred to the Silent Majority and everyone knew who he was referring to. Falwell changed the term to Moral Majority. I take no pleasure in his passing and I feel sad for those who loved him. But in my opinion, he was not a religious leader who advocated doing justice, loving mercy and walking humbly with my Lord.

2/7. Right
Written by trapper joe  | May. 16, 07 08:49
good post.  we don't need to trample all over a dead man's grave, but we don't need to pretend we loved the guy just because he's dead, either.  the fact is, falwell was opposed to everything progressives cared about and he made a big difference in that regard.

3/7. Further Comments
Written by Billy Strain  | May. 16, 07 13:00
Like many of you, I meet the news of Reverend Falwell's passing with mixed feelings.  On the one hand, you can't help but feel some saddness for his family and friends at this time.  Moreover, there is no denying the impact he had on the American Political Scene.  Fundematalist, who had shunned getting involve in the public, mobilized and got organized through his efforts. On the other hand, His efforts basically wedded much of the evangelical community to a political agenda and tried to make being Republican and Christian synonomis.  It is hard to look at this agenda and  the way he went about it and say his effect was positive.  But we can hash over his legacy later, I guess.  It seems that for now we should offer prayers on behalf of his family and wish them Well.

4/7. Contrast
Written by emoody  | May. 16, 07 13:08

Are not Jesse Jackson and Al Sharptin liberal counterparts to Jerry Falwell?


5/7. Can You Even Identify What Denomination They Represent?
Written by Mark  | May. 16, 07 19:21

With regard to Reverends Sharpton and Jackson, can you even identify what church they are ordained in?  How about Reverend Barry Lynn?

 

...And what determines one's "revered" status?  I see nothing to revere in any of these men's work.


6/7. Classic
Written by Jesse  | May. 17, 07 09:49
emoody and mark -- just classic.  we're talking about jerry falwell and you try to change the subject to jesse jackson and al sharpton.  not worth a reply -- at least not on the merits.

7/7. thanks...
Written by Tripp Hudgins  | May. 17, 07 14:20
Good post, Jesse.

I grew up in Virginia.  It is almost impossible to overestimate the impact Falwell had on the lives of Christians and non-Christians alike.  People I knew based their decisions on many issues religious and political based on or in response to Brother Falwell.  As a Baptist minister, his death is a great sadness to me.  And I am not even sure why.  I disagree with him almost completely and yet...He has been a companion on the way.  Does this make sense.  His voice has been in my mind my entire life.

Peace to you, Jerry.  You will be missed...even by some of us liberals.


www.anglobaptist.org

 
< Prev   Next >