The War in Iraq: Are You Getting Your Money's Worth? Print E-mail
By Stan Moody
Sep. 13, 07 08:58

 

We now own Iraq because we chose, in our Wild West fashion, to buy it.  We bought it on the installment plan at roughly $100B a year, or $300 for every man, woman and child.  If you are a family of four, your contribution to the war is $1,200 a year.  Are you getting your money's worth?

 

We now are engaged in semantics of "How do we get out?"  High on the list of rationalizations is the failure of the Iraqi government to act in a "responsible manner." 

 

We don't get out!

 

The reality is that, for better or for worse, we are there. We have de-stabilized the region and strengthened the hand of Iran by our belief that Democracy solves all problems. The problem that Democracy has created, however, is to remove the Sunni balance, however evil it may have been, and institute a Shiia neighbor friendly to Iran.

 

The blame shift to the Iraqi government is what we in Maine call a "red herring."  The Iraqi government is a US puppet government. Whatever it is, we created it, just as we created the Taliban and later destroyed it, only to have it rise stronger than ever from our virtual pullout in Afghanistan. 

 

We cannot now be heard to justify a pull-out from Iraq on the grounds of the inadequacy of its government.  Trying to look like the guys with the white hats is not going to stand the test of history. 

 

We are not the guys with the white hats.  We are a nation presided over by people with limited vision, a limited sense of history and lacking the courage of their convictions.  We are reactive and often without purpose other than a smug satisfaction with our successes.

 

One of the most piercing questions asked of Gen. Petraeus at the recent hearings was by Sen. Byrd:  "General, was there any relationship between 9/11 and Iraq?"  Answer:  "None that I know of, Senator."

 

Iraq was simply the reaction to 9/11 by a nation seeking revenge for being caught off guard -- a curious act for a "Christian" nation. Saddam Hussein was a convenient target because he was a brutal thug and highly visible.  We broke off our mission against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, moved the theatre of war to Iraq and thereby invited Al Qaeda to the party.

 

The blood that flowed began with more than 100,000 Iraqi civilians, many of whom undoubtedly were pregnant women who were granted no "choice." Then it was the blood of thousands of American troops -- dead and wounded.

 

In the resultant vacuum of leadership in Washington, we have created a haven for Al Qaeda that they did not enjoy from the mountains of Pakistan and Afghanistan.  Al Qaeda now has the prospect of having its own nation.  All they have to do is to continue to await the fomenting of US public opinion through the spectacle of hapless politicians twisting in the wind.

 

Maine Senators Snowe and Collins were front and center in support of this triumph of pride over policy.  Rep. Tom Allen, a US Senate candidate, voted against the invasion and then in favor on the next four Iraq budget votes in support for the troops, one guesses.

 

Very simply, Iraq had no connection to Al Qaeda; now it does. By our shortsighted actions, we have strengthened the hand of terrorism not only in the region but in the world.  The profound lack of leadership on both sides of the aisle will haunt this nation for decades to come.    

 

Three answers emerge that will likely not be put on the table by our current government.  1) Push Israel into a resolution of the Palestinian homeland question and gradually shift our presence from Iraq to Israel/Palestine, the fourth largest nuclear power in the world.  2) Get bin Laden, the living symbol of American impotency.  3) Prepare our nation, through a comprehensive energy policy, to go cold-turkey on Middle East oil, now representing only about 13% of our consumption.

 

The reactive policies of our government have consigned us to a military presence in the region for decades to come. 

 

He (bin Laden) "who can run but can't hide" has run, has hidden and has expanded his reach to Iraq, thanks to American hegemony and failure of a comprehensive Middle East policy.  Leadership is not only about crisis management; it is about vision. 

 

"Where the vision fails, the people perish."


LIST OF COMMENTS

1/4. Pay Now Or Later
Written by George  | Sep. 14, 07 09:27
The situation in Iraq and the options that you listed reminds me of an old Sunoco ad from years ago that urged motorists to get frequent oil changes. The catch phrase was, "you can pay me now, or you can pay me later." Of the three options you listed, the only one that stands any chance of being implemented is the first, and given the enmity that exists between Israel and its neighbors, even that one is doubtful. Iraq is going to have its civil war - partly due to the schism that exists between the two sects of Islam, and partly due to the way that the Shiite majority was mistreated during the Sadaam regime.  So unless we are committed to at least 10 more years in Iraq, we're just going to have to face the fact that the two sides are going to fight it out until one of them emerges as clearly victorious. I'm not willing to sacrifice my grandchildren (or anyone else's grandchildren) for what is so clearly a lost cause.

2/4. Military budget
Written by emoody  | Sep. 20, 07 19:08
2002, non-wartime military budget  $489 billion
2007 wartime military budget           $439 billion    (both according to Wikipedia)

The death rate for U.S. men ages 18 to 39 in 2003 was 1.53 per 1,000 -- 39 percent of that of troops in Iraq. But one can also find something equivalent to combat conditions on home soil. The death rate for African American men ages 20 to 34 in Philadelphia was 4.37 per 1,000 in 2002, 11 percent higher than among troops in Iraq. Slightly more than half the Philadelphia deaths were homicides.   (Washington Post By Samuel H. Preston and Emily Buzzell
Saturday, August 26, 2006; A21)

Just some interesting statistics. Looks like its not really about the money as we spend it just as fast in peace time if not faster. As for loss of life, a soldier joins the service with the understanding that he or she might have to go in harms way. At least I did when I enlisted.



3/4. Budget Figures from the Office of Management and Budget, Dept. of Defense
Written by Stan Moody  | Sep. 22, 07 18:03
The President’s Budget:
  • Provides $439.3 billion for the Department of Defense’s base budget—a 7-percent increase over 2006 and a 48-percent increase over 2001—to maintain a high level of military readiness, develop and procure new weapon systems to ensure U.S. battlefield superiority, and support our servicemembers and their families;
  • Requests $50 billion in 2007 bridge funding to support the military’s Global War on Terror efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq into 2007;
  • Expands the Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicle force from 12 to 21 orbits, each supporting 3-4 aircraft, to increase sustained 24-hour surveillance capabilities;
  • Increases substantially the size and capabilities of the Special Operations Command;
  • Adds $173.3 million to continue developing and refining a New Triad of smaller nuclear forces, enhanced missile defenses, and improved command and control; and
  • Provides an additional 2.2-percent increase in basic pay.
 

4/4. I'd Rather Be In Philadelphia
Written by george  | Sep. 24, 07 05:36

Well, those are some pretty impressive statistics. Why don't we just give our soldiers a choice of whether they want to be posted to Iraq or to Philadelphia? i'd rather be in Philadelphia.

I don't think that any generation of Americans would hesitate to commit their lives to defend America. My generation committed nearly 60,000 lives in Vietnam and for what cause? So we could buy their cheap shirts? Please tell me who the "good guys" are in Iraq? Is it the majority Shiites (65%)  who will ally with Iran after we're gone? Or is it the minority Sunnis who ran the country under Saadam? General Petraeus says we may be there for another 10 years. How many more Americans have to die so that we can buy cheap oil?

I don't think that military service is necessarily a prerequisite for the presidency, but if you are going to take such a casual atttitude about the loss of American lives, then you should have done some other duty than protecting our Louisiana coast when your generation was involved in a conflict .


Last Updated ( Sep. 13, 07 09:49 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Faithful Democrats RSS Feed

 

 

 

 

 

Find other books from Faithful Democrats at our Amazon store!