There is a hymn I learned in church
that begins, “We are one in the Spirit, we are one in the Lord . . . And we
pray that all unity may one day be restored.”
The lyrics invoked for those of us in the pews the image of the body of
Christ and reminded us that while we were a single congregation, we were
connected to a global body of believers that with many voices, in many tongues
professed a common faith. But just as
the song affirmed our connectedness, it also spoke to the divisions among
us. “And we pray that all unity may one
day be restored.” The hymn is a plea to
the body divided against itself to “walk with each other” and “work side by
side.” It is this song that immediately
came to my mind as I read the latest stories
about the Bible studies and prayer circles Hillary Clinton has participated in
during her time in Washington, D.C.
One would think people would be
encouraged that a major candidate for the presidency would take time out of her
hectic schedule for prayer and Bible study.
The purpose of these spiritual disciplines is to maintain a strong
foundation in the faith we confess and to try to grow into the people we are
called to be. For many Christians, it is
these practices that shape our moral convictions and remind us of the
responsibility we have not only for our actions, but for our inward
motives. Our elected representatives are
given the job of dealing with crucial issues– the economy, healthcare,
education, war. I know it is my
sincerest hope that they approach these matters, which often are of life and
death, bearing the full weight of their decisions. I want to believe that our nation’s policies
are not made with caprice, or an eye solely toward profit and gain, but with
some reflection on the morality of our actions.
Of course Bible study and prayer is not the only place this reflection
can occur. And the reverse is also true,
that people who engage in these practices do not always do so with pure
motives. But to those with an earnest
heart, God promises “When you call upon me and come and pray to me, I will hear
you. When you search for me, you will
find me; if you seek me with all your heart, I will let you find me” (Jer.
29:12-14).
Instead of being praised for her
daily faith practices, however, Sen. Clinton has come under attack because the
Christian fellowship she keeps is bi-partisan.
To listen to her accusers, one would think that she were part of the
mafia, not a prayer circle, that the words “family” and “fellowship” have their
proper context in the Godfather, and not the Bible. The
tenor of these articles would have us believe that Sen. Clinton has been
brainwashed into a subversive ideology rather than made a faith commitment that
millions of people across the world, and in our own country, have made. At a root level, I believe these attacks are
yet another example of the vitriol that exists within pockets of our own party
against anyone of faith. I know I am not
the only one who, at times, has been made to feel alienated because, in
addition to being a Democrat, I am a person of faith. The reality, of course, is not nearly so
isolating because there are many of us and more and more we are finding our
voice. Nevertheless, it is still
troubling to me when any expression of faith within the Democratic Party is met
with scorn. As many have stressed,
not only is this prejudice counter to Democratic principles of inclusion, but
it also severely undermines the interests of the party.
In addition to this blanket
condemnation of the presence of faith in our political discourse, however, I
believe there is another issue at work. The
accusation against Sen. Clinton is that praying and reading the Bible with
conservatives either reveals her own secret lifelong conservatism or perilously
endangers her Democratic values that will not withstand an onslaught of
conservative theology. I believe her
record directly refutes each of these charges.
Furthermore, this accusation reveals an ignorance of the spirit of
Christian bonds. In our present culture,
where broad characterizations have become preferable to nuanced discourse, we seem
to lack the conceptual ability to grasp a fundamental reality of the Christian
life. As Christians we live in the tension
of being inextricably united to the entire body of believers who share our
faith, even if they are the very people with whom we have our strongest
disagreements. We know that, “There is
one body and one Spirit, just as [we] were called to the one hope of [our]
calling, 5one Lord,
one faith, one baptism, 6one
God” (Ephesians 4:4-5). That does not mean that there are not strong,
even vehement, disagreements within the body, but nevertheless we are
united. And we must be committed to
helping one another grow in truth and love (Heb. 10:24-25). We grow together, even when that growth leads
us in different directions, because, as Former President Clinton said in a recent
speech, we know that this side of the kingdom we only know in part and none
of us are fully conformed to the will of God.
We pray with one another for the unity among us that is possible, for
the areas where we can come together to do good works. But we also pray together in the full
knowledge that this side of the kingdom all unity has not yet been restored.
|
| 3/3. Senator Clinton | | Written by mouse | Apr. 13, 08 13:41 | |
| Has been going out of her way, it seems, to make divisive statements against Obama. That makes it very difficult to percieve her as a unity canidate. I suppose it is tough to charge her as a bi-partisan canidate though, when she's using the Neo-Con playbook.
I don't mind Senator Clinton staying in the debate, I'd just like to see the burned earth tactics stop. This election is more important than one canidates vanity. |
|